Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Bernd Rodler 36167eaa84 fix(ci): point docker client at dind over plaintext TCP
registry login now succeeds (CI_REGISTRY populated correctly) but the
build step failed separately: docker:27-dind defaults to TLS on :2376,
which the docker:27-cli client image doesn't know to use without a
mounted cert dir. DOCKER_HOST=tcp://docker:2375 + DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR=""
is the standard fix for GitLab's Kubernetes executor, where both
containers share the job's pod network namespace.
2026-08-05 19:33:59 +02:00
Bernd Rodler c71175e596 fix(ci): switch back to GitLab's native Container Registry
Confirmed 2026-08-05 the project's Container Registry is now enabled
server-side (visible in the left sidebar under Deploy). That's strictly
better than the GHCR detour: $CI_REGISTRY/$CI_REGISTRY_USER/$CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD
are predefined GitLab CI variables scoped to this project, so this needs
zero manually-created credentials (no GitHub PAT to hold in CI/CD variables).
2026-08-05 19:29:42 +02:00
Bernd Rodler 68d08dbae6 fix(ci): revert to GHCR - GitLab's own registry never got past step 1
GitLab's Container Registry was enabled at the omnibus service level
(registry.gitlab.vnc.biz responds, confirmed with a real GitLab-shaped
401), but the pipeline's build job kept trying to auth against Docker
Hub instead - CI_REGISTRY was empty. Root cause: registry_external_url
only starts the registry SERVICE; gitlab_rails['registry_enabled'] = true
is a separate key that tells the Rails app the registry exists, and it
was never set. Symptom matched exactly: registry reachable, but no
Container Registry toggle anywhere in project settings OR admin settings,
and CI_REGISTRY empty in every job regardless of retry.

Reverting the pipeline to ghcr.io/brvncde-dotcom/vncmail-plus-dev - the
exact image the sandbox was already running before any of this session's
pipeline existed, confirmed public (no imagePullSecrets needed). This is
a revert to a known-working path, not a new risk.

Needs $GITLAB_CI_GHCR_TOKEN (GitHub PAT, write:packages) and
$GITLAB_CI_GHCR_USER as masked/protected CI/CD variables - a GitHub
credential has to come from GitHub, nothing on the GitLab side can
substitute for it.
2026-08-05 19:16:21 +02:00
Bernd Rodler 177b2aca57 feat(ci): pivot to ArgoCD GitOps, fix Traefik ingress after real-cluster check
Direct SSH access to the actual clusters (node1-3 "prod" HA, dev-k8s-1-3
"dev") revealed two things that made the previous design wrong:

1. Neither cluster has vncmail/vnc-ca namespaces or a bulwark ingress at
   all - the "live sandbox" referenced in this repo's docs/manifests was
   never actually applied anywhere. Both ingress.yaml's ingressClassName
   (public) and cert-manager issuer (letsencrypt-prod) were also wrong:
   both clusters run Traefik (class is literally named `traefik`), and
   only dev-k8s has any ClusterIssuer at all (`letsencrypt-staging`).
   node1-3 has zero ClusterIssuers configured.

2. dev-k8s already has ArgoCD installed, idle, zero Applications - more
   idiomatic to use it than have GitLab Runner execute kubectl directly.

Pivots .gitlab-ci.yml: build+push image, then commit the tag into a small
per-overlay Component (overlays/{dev,prod}/image-tag/) that ArgoCD's
Application watches - CI never touches the cluster, only the registry and
this repo. dev's Application (vncmail-dev) is registered and applied
already (manual sync for now, until the one-time namespace secret
bootstrap is done - see VNCMAIL-SETUP.md). prod's Application is
scaffolded in deploy/argocd/ but deliberately not applied - it targets a
different cluster (node1-3) that isn't registered with ArgoCD yet, and
there's still no real prod hostname/Stalwart/ClusterIssuer.

Fixes base/ingress.yaml to the real ingressClassName: traefik (was the
nginx-style `public`, which doesn't exist on either cluster) and gives
each overlay its own cert-manager issuer patch instead of one hardcoded
value, since dev and prod need different (or, for prod, nonexistent)
issuers.
2026-08-05 13:06:22 +02:00
Bernd Rodler 3512f935d1 feat(ci): GitLab CI/CD dev→prod pipeline, kustomize base+overlays
Multiple developers now work on this repo, and the only working deploy
trigger required pushing to GitHub - which contradicts the standing
GitLab-canonical policy for this repo - while every actual deploy was a
manual kubectl run against one environment (no prod exists at all).

Restructures deploy/k8s/ into base/ + overlays/{dev,prod}: overlays/dev
is a verified byte-for-byte no-op for the live sandbox (kubectl kustomize
diff against the old flat layout is empty), overlays/prod is scaffolded
but inert (placeholder hostname + JMAP_SERVER_URL, since neither a prod
hostname decision nor a prod Stalwart exist yet). deploy/k8s/ca/ (the
EJBCA internal CA) is untouched and never referenced by either overlay.

Adds .gitlab-ci.yml: verify (MR gate, no push/deploy) -> build+deploy-dev
(automatic on push to dev, one image name/tag-only environments, fixing
the old -dev/-beta naming split) -> promote (manual, protected
`production` environment, retags the exact dev digest via
`docker buildx imagetools create` - never rebuilds - and is left as a
documented TODO for the actual `kubectl apply` until prod is real).

Updates VNCMAIL-SETUP.md and deploy/k8s/README.md to describe the new
flow and correct the aspirational promotion description that assumed a
"production image" CI never actually built.

Also fixes a pre-existing lint error (no-control-regex false positive on
an intentional DN-sanitizing character class in lib/smime-ca/ejbca.ts)
that was blocking this commit's pre-commit hook - unrelated to this
change otherwise, confirmed already present on dev before this branch.

Runner/RBAC/registry setup is an infra prerequisite this commit cannot
provide - documented in the pipeline plan, not part of this diff.
2026-08-05 11:43:55 +02:00